Week 3and4, Beyond Belief session4

Okay, as I view this conference, it seems that religion and scienceis not being focused as planned. The first gentleman, which I wasnot able to get his name, was using to much terminology that inreality didn't make sense and therefore made it difficult tounderstand. He stated that the brain equals mind and the mind equalscomputer. Now forgive me for being a bit dumb, but how can my mind beconsidered a computer? As far as I know, I don't have a computer chipimplanted in my brain, telling me how to manuver my body and yet tellme how to think...I found his speech out of context and I for suredid not find it within the topic that needed to be discussed. Hebased his speech on slides rather than what he actually felt or wasthere to argue for.I did find the second speaker (Rama) more interesting and I give himcredit for not bashing religion like most of the other speakers havedone through out the conference. He was funny. The only thing that Ido not agree with him is that he states that a personal god does notexist. It may not exist for him, but for people like myself, Ibelieve in a personal God and I'm a true believer that God does workin mysterious ways. I also believe that in order for one to receivegood one must give back. I dont consider myself to be in denial,but I do consider to be a believer that God is watching over me toguide me through the right direction.